In order to consider that  management in fact exists, and not just in words, it is necessary to comply with a number of conditions that are identified in economic cybernetics as axioms.

Axiom N1 

A necessary condition is the presence of observability of the management object.

Observability herewith means the availability of data on the state of properties (indicators) of the managed object at different moments in time.

For example, an employee. Let’s understand whether we manage the employee or not proceeding from the first axiom.

First, we should understand what qualities of the employee we consider important for management.

For example, professionalism, or in other words, the ability to go to a decision maker.

The next step is to understand whether we have the data for this skill at different moments. Let’s say we have decided to evaluate this skill on a 10-point scale. Do we have the estimated data for this skill for the year on a monthly basis? Or for 10 years annually?

And regarding other qualities of the employee? Do we have the necessary collected data over the necessary time period?

If our management does not comply with one of the axioms, then we can assume that we do not manage our employee.

Axiom N2

Management availability or the ability to transfer the object under management from one existing state to another under the influence of the management system.

This axiom is the most obvious. If we see that under the influence of management actions, the employee’s qualities are changed where we need, we understand that we manage the employee. It is easy to see that this axiom will not work without the first, and in order to verify the response of the management object it is necessary to have the data on the state of the object, both prior to the management action and thereafter.

Let’s continue the example with the employee. If we measured the manager’s ability to go to a decision maker within a year, and we have noted the point where the management impact-training was applied and if after this we saw that the measured object was changed as we planned, then the condition of Axiom N2 has been fulfilled.

And if not? If the object has not been changed or has changed differently than we planned, then we are not managing this object.

Axiom N3

Management Goal. Management Goal means a set of values of quantitative or qualitative characteristics that determine the required state of the managed object.

If the goal is unknown, the management is of no sense, and changing the object’s state turns into an aimless task. The goal can be known at the point which the system is to be moved from its existing state.

It seems to be obvious that without a purpose, there is no management,its but  this axiom establishes the right emphasis  – the goal should be precisely quantitative, according to the same properties and their states of the managed object.

Axiom N4

 The ability to select management actions (solutions) from a set of acceptable and available alternatives.

One of the most interesting axioms. It says that we must have a definite (permissible and, therefore, thoughtful) set of the management actions.

In the previous example, we talked about such a driving influence as training, but Axiom N4 states that there should be several such factors and the managing director should be free to choose. For example, it could be: writing a script, motivation, demotivation, and change of the employee, etc.

In fact, the company should specify a list of the permissible management actions. And, of course, data collection will allow us to assess the quality of the management actions, that is, such a “catalogue of management actions” should also be analyzed, improved and developed.

Axiom N5

 Management Effectiveness Criterion.

A generalized criterion for the management effectiveness is the degree to which the system (organization) achieves its goal.

In general, according to the organization, the whole set of the management actions can be considered effective if the organization achieves its stated goals. But, individual management actions can be evaluated if one measures the degree of their influence on the change in the state of the managed object.

Several interesting observations follow from this axiom:

1. In most cases, ordinary people appreciate the quality of the organization elements without knowing its goals.
2. The criterion is not achievement of the goal, but the degree of achievement. This axiom takes into account variability by default,and the question is about the level of variability.
3. Tracking indicators according to the goa becomes a priority in relation to other indicators.
4. Formation and formulation of the goals are the basic strategic functions.

Axiom N6

 Availability of resources (material, financial, labor, etc.) that ensure the implementation of decisions taken.

A lack of resources is equal to a lack of freedom in choosing management actions.

Returning to Axiom N4, a lack of resources significantly reduces our “catalogue of management actions”.

Conclusion:

What major conclusion should I draw from these axioms?

A person, in principle, cannot be a totally  effective manager. I have not heard of a  manager whose management corresponds at least 90% to these axioms.

Even if there are such supermen/superwomen, they are only available for large companies with a good management budget.

So, what should us mere mortals do? We have to come to terms with the fact that we are ineffective, don’t we?

Yes, we could have reconcilled, but there is a way out and our competitors will surely take advantage of it.

What is the way out? The solution is to transfer our management to the information systems of the new generation.

What, if not the automated management system, will be able to comply with all six axioms?

Collect and quickly process a lot of data? It can do it!

Objectively evaluate the transfer from one state to another? Yes, only the information system can accurately estimate it.

Choose from the catalogue of management actions the most necessary at the present moment? It can do it.

Evaluate according to management effectiveness criteria? Certainly. A person would need  to rely on intuition or use very complicated calculations.

Information systems have many more resources, such as time or computing performance. The modern automation systems can do a lot of things at once – remind, transfer tasks, collect data, analyze, interpret and much more.

What will remain for people to do? Will people become unnecessary? Of course they will! People will be working in more interesting and  more highly paid positions. Yes, this is goal-setting!

Perhaps I’m exaggerating a bit in this article, and many people will not agree with me that it’s time to replace the human-manager,but this is the trend! And the question is, who among your competitors will do it first?

Atlas Software developed and are already implementing in dozens of companies an automated system of organization management that fully complies with these six axioms. Isn’t it time your company made this step too? Visit our site

FinancesOnline is a trusted B2B platform where companies from all industries turn to find the ideal software for their needs. A customer-centered expert team is therefore looking for young and promising solutions to shift focus from overrated leaders, and uses a special scoring mechanism to determine the value such can provide against a modest investment. Having confirmed that Atlas ERP meets even their nitpickiest criteria, they named it the Rising Star of 2017, and awarded it with their Great User Experience Award for online ERP software.

What was really fascinating for this experienced team was the unique modular approach Atlas uses to trigger both smarter resource allocation and more productive marketing strategies. Being able to confirm first-hand Atlas’s beneficial effect on companies’ online interactions, FinancesOnline.com also listed it among its most popular ERP software products for the current year. According to them, this was also a result of our system covering vital BPM and project management functions, and thus eliminating the need to invest in additional systems and applications. In this regard, experts also discussed the numerous integrations and partnerships of our system that make it fully useable since day one.

“Usually a system supports one particular methodology. This may cause problems for the users, – says Sergei Vikharev, the Head of Atlas Software. – Of course, we also have our preferences, but we do not want to impose our vision. Everyone should be able to work the way he/she wants and how he/she is used to. Therefore, we leave the choice to the client”.

The Projects Module is smoothly integrated into a single ecosystem of Atlas Software products, so the users may apply project management to sales and processing orders, or link it to business processes and simulate a task sequence. Visualization of all data in a special project panel allows prompt work with a great deal of information.

With the help of artificial intelligence elements, Atlas Projects determines the priority of tasks and compiles a daily list of errands for each team member. In addition, the system gathers statistics for each project and provides detailed analytics. It enables both the head and the employees to quickly navigate through dozens and even hundreds of projects and see what is happening in each of them.

In addition, an android-app has also been developed for Atlas Projects. It is browser-based and fully integrated with the main cloud system. This allows the user to monitor projects and tasks anywhere.
In the near future, the company plans to adjust the service to other project management methodologies as well as to create an iOS application and improve and expand the existing functionality.